Is it just me, or is it generally assumed that leadership is something that other people do?
For example, we generally deem leaders to be special people. They get extra attention. They need to be studied. Leaders have “strengths”.
Those strengths are nearly always positive: leaders are thought to be articulate, wise, empathic and so on. And with just a little more effort, a little more diligence, they could go from being “good” to being “excellent”.
Ordinary people seem more likely to have weaknesses. We just are. We get on with the boring day-to-day activities while the leaders lead – somewhere up there in the stratosphere. We’re simply not in the same league.
This is starting to sound dangerously like a self-esteem problem – in me. If only I was a bit more self-confident, self-aware, talented and above all hard working and diligent then I too could become a “leader”. And oh how happy I would be, if I could only share in some of what those special people have.
But what if leadership isn’t an attribute to be conferred on only the annointed? What if leadership is a set of behaviours that is available to every one of us?
What if it’s a personal thing? Something we can all do, even the lowly and the least talented? What then?
And what if leadership isn’t really as complicated as some experts would have us believe? What if it’s simply being clear, at least to ourselves, who we are and what is important to us; and then living in that way, consistently, to reach our highest ideals?
Of course, if that was the case, and we all led in a personal sense, would we need the other sort of leader? Those at the top of the pile?
There are reasons why we wouldn’t want to even consider this, of course.
Not being one of the leaders makes it’s easier for me to blame them for my condition. Whether it’s politicians, corporate and financial leaders, or even religious leaders – they’re the ones who are really responsible for my troubles.
And I’m not saying it’s easy to lead. Maybe it’s easier to let others take the lead? Maybe that’s why we need to leave it to the “special” people?
But there’s a problem with letting others lead.
For one, it doesn’t seem to have got us to such a good place. The economy’s in collapse. Politicians are besmirched. The planet’s being destroyed. The poverty gap is growing. Our livelihoods are at risk.
Letting others lead us towards their goals seems dangerous.
Surely we do need leaders don’t we? Where would we be without any leaders to rescue us, to save us?
That seems to me a little like saying “where would we be without economic growth?” That’s a paradigm that we have adopted blindly for years. And look where it has got us.
Maybe now’s the time to reconsider our system of leadership. Not just how we select leaders, and who they are, but who we call a leader.