A recent post in the Conscious Capitalism LinkedIn group made me think about what happens when a group – a company – gets too big.
Is this the end for consciousness? Can large companies sustain the consciousness that small groups can?
As a young man I worked for a Fortune 50 company called Digital Equipment. (No relation to the much smaller and less successful Digital Research – the company that produced the operating system CP/M).
This was a company which grew organically from a $70,000 investment in 1957 to a $14bn corporation employing some 120,000 people. Eventually it faltered and was sold to Compaq in 1997 – in what was at the time the largest merger ever in the computer industry.
As some of you will remember Compaq itself faltered and was acquired by HP in 2002.
But my story is about growth. And demise.
Following its meteoric rise over 40 years, the hard fact is that DEC was a large company that faltered and eventually disappeared.
You could put this down to all sorts of reasons. Unseen flaws in what was a highly collaborative, innovative but also caring culture? Failure to adapt to a changing marketplace? Even narcissism amongst the top team? We can speculate endlessly.
Or maybe it just got too big.
But there’s a letter from a friend and colleague of mine in Ed Schein’s book on DEC (DEC is Dead, Long Live DEC – The Lasting Legacy of Digital Equipment Corporation).
Schein was a consultant with DEC for many years, and it was seemingly where some of his enduring ideas about organisational culture – and process consulting – emerged.
My friend’s letter suggests that when a big corporation disappears we can talk of death. But we can also talk of new life.
He suggests we picture a sunflower. When the flower is ready, the hundreds of thousands of seeds – the employees – spread far and wide, born on the wind. They take with them the DNA of the organisation.
And indeed look around the world today and you will find many ex-DEC employees still following the values that attracted them to DEC -we could call them ‘power’ and ‘love’ – and bringing them into their working lives with new colleagues and new companies.
I like this story – obviously, because it is little self-flattering. It also helps me make sense of what happened, and the loss – of great culture, great dreams, great experiences and great friendships.
But I also think it is a story worth telling. Because it reminds me that at core organisations really are only people.
Yes, something special can happen when a group of people coalesce together in a special way – a new matrix is formed. I think groups and companies are really important. I also think that we are attracted to groups that share our values anyway – that is why we get together.
Companies – groups of people working together (literally, breaking bread together) – give us strength and collective power. And that is good if linked with generative purpose.
But we can also sustain our values individually, even if we move from one organisation to another. Our identity as individuals continues.
In many ways it is harder – being together is great. But I think being alone also contains strength and power.
And sometimes it seems to me to better than relying on any one organisation – however comforting it may be – for our sense of identity.
I’d be interested to hear what others think.
Is the “great group” the be all and end all of working consciously?
Or is there something to be said (heroism, for example) for being alone with one’s values?